Insect Resistance-Transgenic Plants

Although weeds are a nuisance, even worse enemies of plants, and correspondingly more expensive to farmers, are:

1 . Insects and roundworms
2 . Fungal diseases (molds, blights, rusts, and rots)
3 . Viral diseases of plants

It is possible to engineer plants for resistance to all of these, but we will consider just the insects here. Spraying crops with insecticides is a very costly and hazardous procedure. Insecticides are often more toxic to humans than are herbicides, because insecticides target species closer to our own.

Many insect biochemical pathways are found not only in humans, but also in rodents or birds that may inhabit crop fields. Luckily, naturally occurring toxins exist that are lethal to insects but harmless to mammals.


The prime example is the toxin from a soil bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis . Bt toxin , as it is called, has been sprayed on crops to prevent insects such as the cotton bollworm and European corn borer from destroying cotton and corn, respectively. Damage from the European corn borer plus the cost of insecticides to control it cost farmers about $1 billion annually. Damage by the corn borer also makes corn plants susceptible to infection with a toxic fungus that can harm humans if ingested.

Bacteria of the genus Bacillus produce spores that contain a crystalline or Cry protein . When insects eat Bacillus spores, the Cry protein breaks down and releases delta endotoxin (i.e., the Bt toxin).

This toxin binds to the intestinal lining of the insect and generates holes, which cripple the digestive system, and the insect dies.

Different species of Bacillus produce a family of different but related Cry proteins. These were originally classified according to insect susceptibility:
CryI killed Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths),
CryII killed both Lepidoptera and Diptera (flies),
CryIII killed Coleoptera (beetles), and
CryIV killed Diptera (but not Lepidoptera ).

However, as the number of known Cry variants increased, this classification became too simplistic, because sequence similarities did not always correspond to the spectrum of insecticidal activity.

Cry proteins are now classified with Arabic numerals into some 20 subfamilies based on sequence relationships.

Instead of spraying insects with the toxin, scientists have used transgenic technology to insert the cry genes directly into plants. When a cloned toxin gene was inserted into tomato plants, it partly protected against tobacco hornworm. However, the plants made only low levels of the toxin because the toxin gene is from a bacterium and is designed to express well in bacteria, not plants.

Therefore the toxin gene was altered to enhance expression. The original toxin is a big protein that has 1156 amino acids. However, only the first 650 amino acids are necessary for the toxic effect; therefore, the protein was truncated by deleting the last half of the gene. The shorter, truncated protein requires less energy to produce.

Next, the toxin gene was placed under the control of a promoter that gives constant high-level expression in plants. Certain promoters from plant viruses, such as cauliflower mosaic virus, satisfy these requirements and give 10-fold increases in toxin production.


When genes from one organism are expressed in a very different host cell, codon usage also becomes a probleM. The genetic code is redundant in the sense that several different codons can encode the same amino acid. So although a protein has a fixed amino acid sequence, there is considerable choice in which codons to use. Different organisms favor different codons for the same amino acid and have different levels of the corresponding tRNAs. If a gene uses codons for a rare tRNA, the supply of this may limit the rate of protein synthesis. In practice this is relevant only to genes expressed at high levels—exactly the situation here. Therefore the insect toxin gene was altered by changing many of the bases in the third position of redundant codons.

Almost 20% of its bases were altered to make it more plantlike in codon usage. This did not alter the amino acids encoded and, therefore, the toxin protein itself was not affected by this procedure. However, the rate at which plant cells made the protein greatly increased and gave another 10-fold increase in toxin production. Transgenic Bt crops such as cotton and corn have many advantages over spraying the fields with the toxin itself. One advantage is the toxin doesn’t drift over other areas, which prevents cross-contamination. Using transgenic crops reduces the amount of insecticide needed. In 1998, about 450,000 kg less insecticide was used on the U.S. cotton crop alone. Yet only 45% of the cotton crop was actually transgenic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *